The Illegitimate State of Israel

Hey, If you like the article, don't be afraid to show it ;) __________________________________________________

Formation of Modern Day Israeli Illegitimate State
                                                              

          For centuries, the Jews have had their presence all over the world, but were mostly concentrated in North Africa, Arab states and in Europe (mostly Germany, Austria, and the UK), USA and some parts of Latin America (South America) ; but they didn’t have their own state with a Jewish majority and were desperate to have one they could call their own.
          Following the world wars, most of the Muslim Ottoman Empire was broken up and captured by allies that implemented their own rules in these territories.  After the 2nd world war ended, the Jewish population was mostly exiled from Europe and was sent to Palestinian territories to occupy and live there. All this happened under the British support. The British first kept the Jews in refugee camps as the Muslims were not ready to accept this. Later on, they were given armed support and were set free to occupy by force. Seeing the gradually weakening British control on Palestine, the Jewish militant and terrorist groups started a revolt against the British Rule in a desperate attempt to gain an area for themselves under cover of statements from their Holy Book, that that part of earth had been promised to them in their Holy Book. There were soon mob attacks on Muslim populations and this started a series of fights ultimately leading to a situation that could be called a civil war.
          In 1947, the British announced that they would soon be ending their Palestinian mandate as the things were going out of control and no agreement could be made between the Jews and the Arabs.  The newly formed United Nations presented a partition plan for this region, on 29 November 1947, which was named as Partition Plan for Palestine (United Nations General Assembly Resolution 181). According to this plan, there were two states to be formed; Palestine and Israel. Israel was to be formed on the Palestinian territories occupied by the Jewish minority of the region and Jerusalem was to be made a city under the control of United Nations.  As could be expected, the Arab League and Palestinians refused to accept this plan as it was compromising nearly all the rights and major part of Palestinian land. The Jews were delighted and accepted the plan as it was favoring them completely.
          The British mandate was to end on 15th of May, 1948. On 14th of May, 1948, the Jewish Agency declared independence and vowed to start an armed struggle and snatch the lands from the locals. As a result, Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Yemen launched a joint Arab League war to defend the Palestinian territories. The Israelis were armed and supported by the allies and so were well equipped as compared to Arab League Force. After a very fierce fighting, for over a year, a cease fire was reached. Temporary borders were setup and given the name Green Line.  According to this cease fire treaty, West Bank and Jerusalem (East) were given in control of Jordan and Gaza Strip was taken over by the Egyptian Authorities. Both the Palestinians and Jews suffered heavy losses of life and major economic crises. Millions of Palestinians were displaced. However the leaders of Jewish Population declared the occupied territories as their “Holy land” and made it clear to the Muslim neighbors that they would say there and Israel is a reality. None of the Arab world countries accepted Israel, as it was a country without any legitimacy.

The War in 1967

          The Green Line, the Israeli occupation and false propaganda against its neighboring countries led to worsening of ties with the neighboring states. In 1967, the Egyptian Army expelled United Nations forces from the Egyptian lands of Sinnai peninsula.  Egypt, Jordan and Syria started to mobilize their forces as Israel continued to threat. On 5th of June, 1967, Israel launched an attack on Jordan, Egypt and Syria. Backed by the US, UK and other western powers, tiny Israeli army defeated the forces of Egypt, Syria and Jordan and after a fight of 6 days, the Arab armies surrendered.  Israel captured Jerusalem and West Bank from Jordan, Gaza Strip from Egypt and also the Golan Heights.
In this way, most of the Palestinian land fell to the Jews who till now occupy and maintain a firm occupation in the region.

How The Occupation of Palestine is Illegal:

          Bringing an end to the Israeli occupation of Palestinian land is as much a prerequisite for peace in the Middle East as is the Palestinian recognition of Israel. The Israeli occupation is not only inhuman and the cause of extreme suffering for the 3.5 million Palestinians living under its subjugation, but it is also illegal under international law. Attempts to claim otherwise have no legal validity and are morally bankrupt and politically dangerous since they basically preclude the achievement of peace.
          While it is true that victorious powers can legally occupy hostile territories seized in the course of conflict - an example of which is the Allies' occupation of the territory of Nazi Germany during World War II, foreign occupation should nevertheless be a temporary situation, pending a political settlement or solution. During the interim, the occupying Power must comply with relevant instruments of international humanitarian law with regard to its conduct in the territory it has occupied.
          International law is very clear on two basic principles: the inadmissibility of the acquisition of  territory  by  war  and  the  prohibition  of  the  transfer  of  civilians of  the occupying Power to the occupied territory. Both are intended to prevent expansionism and the colonization of occupied territories. Both complement another explicit principle of international law, namely the right of peoples to self-determination, a right that a colonial or occupying Power is obliged to respect.
The Israeli occupation has clearly violated all three of these principles of international law. In fact, throughout its prolonged occupation, Israel has persistently and aggressively breached international law.
          Thus, what makes the Israeli occupation of Palestinian land illegal is not the fact that it occurred during the war of 1967 (regardless of the narrative concerning the causes of the war). What makes the Israeli occupation illegal is that it has existed for 35 years, during which time it transformed into a form of colonialism and suppressed and oppressed an entire people for decades, preventing them from the exercise of their right to self-determination and the establishment of their State, Palestine.
Israel, as an occupying Power, has undertaken countless measures attempting to change the legal status, demographic composition and character of the territory by confiscating land, exploiting natural resources, building more than 250 settlements, transferring more than 400,000 Israelis to the occupied territories, establishing a dual system of law and even annexing part of the territory.
These actions have been carried out in direct contravention of the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, which, among other things, defines the rules of conduct and the obligations of the occupying Power. Clearly then, the active intent of the Israeli occupation has been to negate Palestinian rights, to create new facts on the ground and to illegally expand Israel's borders.
          Security Council resolution 242 (1967), which is the bedrock of the peace process and of any future peace settlement, is anchored in the principle of the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war. The old and deceptive argument that the resolution calls for withdrawal from 'territories' and not 'the territories' not withstanding (in fact, the French text of the resolution does contain the article 'the'). The call in the resolution for the withdrawal of Israel can only be read within the context of the above-mentioned principle.
          Since the onset of the Israeli occupation in 1967, and in response to established, illegal policies and practices of the occupying Power, the Security Council has adopted 26 resolutions that affirmed the applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention to the territories occupied by Israel. Of those resolutions, several deal directly with the issue of Israeli settlements and several also specifically deal with Israeli violations in Occupied East Jerusalem.
          The resolutions clearly address the illegality of Israel's policies and practices with regard to both issues. For example, some of the resolutions affirm that the Israeli settlements 'have no legal validity'; call upon the government and people of Israel 'to dismantle the existing settlements'; and call upon 'all States not to provide Israel with any assistance to be used specifically in connection with settlements in the occupied territories'.
          As for Occupied East Jerusalem, which the Israeli government illegally annexed in 1980, the Security Council, in resolution 478 (1980), determined 'that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power, which have altered or purport to alter the character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, and, in particular, the recent "basic law" on Jerusalem are null and void and must be rescinded forthwith'.
          Similar affirmations were made by the Council in several other resolutions. Moreover, the General Assembly and other UN organs have adopted scores of resolutions on the illegal policies and practices of the Israeli occupation and on the legitimacy of, and the necessity for, the exercise of the right to self-determination by the Palestinian people.
          There has therefore been absolutely no impropriety on the part of the UN Secretary-General concerning his recent statements with regard to the Israeli occupation. Kofi Annan's call for an end to 'the illegal occupation' was not only legally correct but was also not a concept invented by the Secretary-General, as reflected in the numerous resolutions of the United Nations. It was, however, important for Mr. Kofi Annan to add his moral authority to the urgent need for an end to that illegal occupation, particularly during this late stage in the perilous deterioration of the situation.
In that statement on 12 March 2002, the Secretary-General addressed both the Palestinian and Israeli sides. The Palestinian side probably did not like everything it heard. But, taken in its entirety, the statement was widely viewed as a necessary and responsible call that intended to, and should, help the parties to move forward towards a peaceful settlement. For this to happen, the Israeli people and the Israeli government must indeed come to terms, for once and for all, with the illegality of their occupation and the need for its termination.


The first map is Israel as it was first created by UN declaration in 1947. The blue portion is Israel; the rest is all Arab lands. Note that Jerusalem was completely within Arab lands and Israel was much smaller than it is today. Note also that there is NO Israeli presence inside the area surrounding Jerusalem. No settlements, certainly no IDF. 
The red square outlines the approximate region shown below.
 The second map shows Israel as it is today. Note that the western border of Palestine has been pushed up to Jerusalem. Such a land grab is NOT the result of a defensive act, but of an invasion to bring Jerusalem under Israeli control, even though Jerusalem was not originally part of Israel. The maps clearly tell the story of an Israel conquering lands which do not belong to it. Since Sharon took office, Israel has built more illegal Jewish Settlements on Palestinian land. Note on the above map that the majority of the lands which were originally Arab lands when Israel was created, are now under complete (dark blue) or partial (green) Israeli control. Only the black areas remain to the Palestinians, and those are shrinking by the minute. 




The Loss of Palestinian Lands from 1946-2000; The maps tell it all! : 

          How does a defensive action result in the total conquest of the lands of others? The answer is that it does not. Israel is the aggressor. The maps of Israel then and now prove it.
Hey, if you like the article, don't be afraid to show it ;) __________________________________________________


Digg Technorati del.icio.us Stumbleupon Reddit Blinklist Furl Spurl Yahoo Simpy

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf is by no means PML (Q) or Convention League

Hey, If you like the article, don't be afraid to show it ;) __________________________________________________

Introduction: Recently there has been much discussion over Imran Khan's PTI: Is it actually going to be a revolutionary party; or is it going to fail as all the "old faces" are joining it? The points stated by the supporters of the latter view are pretty weak and unjust, and are falsified in this post.
__________________________________________________________

         It was April 1996 when Imran Khan announced the start of a new political party- a party that was started for the delivery of "INSAF" (Justice) to the tyranny-struck Pakistanis, and to make Pakistan truly the land dreamt of by Jinnah and Iqbal.

         Due to Imran Khan's overwhelming popularity as the world cup winning captain, he was met with enormous responses from public. But the support was not political, so the party met a devastating result in the elections of 1997. It was a small party and such a defeat caused it to shatter. Many leaders left PTI and it seemed that the party would end right there. But it was not so, the courageous captain continued his struggle, kept alive PTI, met many ups and downs in the era of Nawaz Sharif and General Musharraf, got elected as MNA in 2005 elections and resigned in 2007 in support of All Parties Democratic Movement for the restoration of democracy.

         After passing through all that trouble PTI now finally seems to be getting support of the public, and many politicians are rushing into this party. This gathering of politicians has led to a serious question: Is PTI going to serve the same purpose for which it came into existence, or is it just another hallucination that Pakistanis are suffering from? It has been repeated claimed by adversaries of PTI that it is a party being established by ESTABLISHMENT and that a group of same old people can by no means bring a change to Pakistan. Some are even comparing it with PML (Q) and Convention league. To falsify this lame accusation we first need to know about these factions.

         Convention Muslim league was a party built by a man already in power, General Ayub Khan. It is quite evident that people always want to join the ruling side and so they supported General Ayub Khan. These people by no means were loyal to nation. They clearly had the intention to "rule”. As soon as General Ayub stepped down from power, they all left him in a short span of time and now this convention league is just a matter of history.

         PML (Q) had almost the same story. After General Musharraf came to power in 1999, these leaders left their parent party PML (N) and formulated a new political party for enjoying the "RULING RIGHTS" and gave it the name of PML (Q).

         In contrast to Convention league or PML (Q), people are coming in PTI by leaving their ruling parties. As an example, consider Jahangeer Tareen, a former member of PML (Q), who resigned from his national assembly seat and joined PTI. Similarly Shah Mehmood Qureshi and Javaid Hashmi also have resigned from their seats in national assembly to join PTI. This clearly depicts the difference between PTI and PML (Q) or Convention league. 

         Secondly people claim that it is impossible to bring revolution with these old faces. The honest truth about it is that Imran Khan did not go to anyone begging him to join his party. The only man to whom Imran Khan went requesting to join PTI was Javaid Hashmi whose high political stature and patriotism is beyond any doubt. If people want to come in PTI, there is no way a leader would deny it. During the era of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), people became Muslims in hordes but there were also Al-Munafiqoons. Prophet (PBUH) knew it but it was not possible to scrutinize them (I quoted it just an example, as Allah says in Quran to learn from Prophet(PBUH). There is STRICTLY no intention of comparison). The other important point to remember is that Imran Khan has repeatedly said in his interviews that these people are coming in PTI on unconditional basis. This entirely rules out the allegation on Imran Khan that he is recruiting new people into by PTI by giving them initiatives. 

         The third and perhaps the most important thing is that if we trust Imran Khan as the leader than we should trust his selection too. He has been maintaining in his TV interviews that seats shall be allocated on merit basis. He said that a parliamentary board shall be formed that shall give tickets on merit basis and this board shall make sure that the particular person is free from any sort of major corruption charges.

         People have been continuously accusing PTI as a party established by bureaucrats and army men. I simply ask them to name a politician that has no history with the establishment. Nawaz Shareef had been the part of General Zia's government; Altaf Hussain was established in the era of General Zia and later supported by General Musharraf. Even the most influential of leaders, Z.A Bhutto was a part of General Ayub's government. 

         This discussion however does not imply that Imran Khan is also a man supported by establishment. Establishment may recruit new people to a party but they cannot force the people to leave their homes. The "TSUNAMIS" of Lahore and Karachi clearly displayed the support from the public. Can establishment gather a charged crowd like these ones?? No, it seems quite absurd. The reason for this baseless propaganda is that when people in the politics see no description for their own shortcomings or the success of someone else, they just blame establishment which seems the simplest excuse.


THE ABSOLUTE VERDICT:
      We as a nation have always been brisk in making decisions and this thing has always gone against us pushing us in a state of anarchy and restlessness. It is time we take a break and give Imran Khan some time. The sudden influx of a lot many people has definitely raised many questions about their integrity but Imran Khan as a leader could not have refused them , he has promised to deliver Pakistan the best available team and has maintained that any corrupt politician shall not be tolerated .His stance is clearly depicting it. In his speech at Karachi jalsa he said that no matter how much you flatter Imran, the final decision shall be on merit. I think it is time we put our trust in Imran and see if he can do what he has promised the nation. I hope he shall not disappoint the nation.


Hey, if you like the article, don't be afraid to show it ;) __________________________________________________


Digg Technorati del.icio.us Stumbleupon Reddit Blinklist Furl Spurl Yahoo Simpy

New Year - 5 Simple Reslutions All Pakistanis Should Make!

Hey, If you like the article, don't be afraid to show it ;) __________________________________________________

 This is a VERY short but meaningful post for the New Year! :) Explanations have been deliberately omitted for brevity and simplicity.
--------------

Everyone makes bright plans and resolutions for himself/herself as the new year approaches. The practice is effective if followed properly; it helps them improve themselves and live more comfortably.

But apart from the personal resolutions which you all must have made, why not make some SIMPLE but highly valuable resolutions for the good of our homeland Pakistan?

The 5 resolutions given below, though exceedingly simple, will surely do wonders for Pakistan if you follow them well!


1. Say "No" to Provincialism; and "Yes" to Nationalism.
Eliminate provincialsm from your heart.

2. Put an end to racism and hate-promoting factors e.g. sms campaigns against certain casts, people and races; jokes are jokes only when they don't hurt anyone.

(Note: We have emphasized these points in detail in other articles by us.
http://absoluteverdict.blogspot.com/2011/12/appeal-to-all-pakistanis-unity-faith.html
http://absoluteverdict.blogspot.com/2011/10/all-pakistanis-please-put-end-to-jokes.html )

3. Keep your homeland clean, make a small habit to not throw trash/wrappers or anything at all on the roads.

4. Speak up against what is wrong and try to change it: violence, injustice, child abuse, racism etc.

5. Convey the beneficial points you discover/learn to everyone you know. Spreading your enlightenment is necessary to bring about change on a huge scale.

I request you to keep these points in your mind at all times! :)
-----------

In the end, the Absolute Verdict Team wishes all the readers a very happy new year! May you all achieve all your noble desires and play your role in Pakistan's rise! :)

Thanks for being with us! :)
Best wishes!
Hey, if you like the article, don't be afraid to show it ;) __________________________________________________


Digg Technorati del.icio.us Stumbleupon Reddit Blinklist Furl Spurl Yahoo Simpy
Newer Posts Older Posts Home

Text Ads from InfoLinks

Please join our Facebook page through the 'Like' button below to support our aim & efforts! :)

Follow us on Blogger/Google

Live Traffic Feed

Copyright (c) The Absolute Verdict, 2010-2011. Powered by Blogger.
Our blog is a member of the following networks

The Absolute Verdict

The AbsoluteVerdict hosts original, well-researched articles on a variety of issues.

The main categories are:

National: Articles related to Pakistan
International: Articles related to world issues
Technology: Articles related to all forms of IT
Photography: Articles/Photos - coming soon

Copyright Details

myfreecopyright.com registered & protected

Total Pageviews

    Related Posts

    Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Recent Comments